Chemotherapy- and radiotherapy- induced nausea
and vomiting
Nausea and vomiting is one of the most severe side-effects associated
with cancer therapy, and can result from chemotherapy - Chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting (CINV) and radiotherapy (radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting). The effects of nausea and vomiting can
be more distressing to a patient than future concerns of life expectancy,
sometimes resulting in the patient choosing to discontinue potentially
curative therapy[1].
The medical complications of nausea and vomiting include dehydration,
electrolyte imbalance and a risk of aspiration pneumonia. However
much of cancer therapy has a palliative intent and quality of life
is important. Therefore the effective management of nausea and
vomiting associated with cancer therapy is one of the primary goals.
The aetiology and risk factors for
CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Not all patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy will experience
nausea and vomiting but it has been estimated that (untreated) it
occurs in up to 70% of patients receiving cancer chemotherapy[2].
There are three types of nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy
and radiotherapy, each with different aetiologies[3],[4],[5]:
- Acute nausea and vomiting. This lasts
for 12-24 hours.
- Delayed nausea and vomiting. This may
occur up to 5 days after chemotherapy. It is less apparent in
the case of radiotherapy.
- Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. This
conditioned response results from the patient's expectation (anticipation)
of nausea and vomiting.
There are a number of predictive factors to take into account[2],[6], and these can be divided
into patient risk factors, drug
risk factors and procedural risk factors.
Patient risk factors
- Age. Children are more likely to develop nausea
and vomiting than adults
- Gender. The prevalence of nausea and vomiting is higher
in women
- History of nausea and vomiting. Patients with a history
of motion sickness may have a lower threshold to nausea and vomiting
than the rest of the population. This can be exacerbated by patient
anxiety and by a prior history of nausea and vomiting associated
with chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- History of heavy alcohol use. This is associated with
a lower risk of nausea and vomiting.
Drug risk factors
This is by far the most important risk factor for CINV. There
is a wide range of emetic potential in chemotherapeutic drugs.
This ranges from highly emetogenic agents such as cisplatin to weak
emetogens such as fluorouracil, though individuals vary in their
response (table 3).
|
Mildly emetic treatment
|
Fluorouracil
Etoposide
Methotrexate (less than 100mg/m2)
Vinca alkaloids |
|
Moderately emetic treatment
|
Doxorubicin
Cyclophosphamide (low and intermediate doses)
Mitoxantrone
Methotrexate (high does - 0.1-1.2g/m2)
|
|
Highly emetic treatment
|
Cisplatin
Dacarbazine
Cyclophosphamide (high doses)
|
Source: British National Formulary, March,
2002
Table 3 Emetic potential of some chemotherapeutic agents
The dose, duration of infusion and number of cycles of chemotherapy
are important factors for CINV, with shorter infusion cycles generally
increasing the risk. Combination drug regimes can increase the
risk of CINV.
Patients on chemotherapy or radiotherapy may be in significant
pain, and undergoing treatment with opioid analgesics. The
opioids in turn will add to the emetic risk.
Procedural risk factors
With radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting the site irradiated
is important. Radiotherapy to the brain, skull and spine, upper
abdomen, stomach, bowel or close to the liver is more likely to
induce nausea and vomiting than treatment of other sites. Higher
doses of radiation, longer duration of treatment and a larger treatment
field will also increase the emetic risk.
The causes of CINV and
radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
As described in more detail elsewhere
numerous neuronal pathways converge on the vomiting
centre in the medulla (part of the hind brain) where the vomiting
reflex is initiated. These include vagal sensory pathways from
the gastrointestinal tract and neuronal pathways from the labyrinths,
higher centres of the cortex, intracranial pressure receptors and
the Chemoreceptor Trigger
Zone (CTZ).
The exact involvement of each of these pathways in CINV and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting is not known. However, it is thought that
stimulation of vagal sensory pathways results from agents released
due to cell damage. For example serotonin (5HT) is released from
enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal tract[7]. Also activation of
the CTZ is thought to be caused either by the treatment itself or
by agents released from cells damaged by the treatment.
The factors involved in radiotherapy- or chemotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting are shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9 The factors involved with CINV and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting
The consequences of CINV and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting
As with other forms of nausea and vomiting, CINV and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting can be very distressing and result in practical
consequences for patients and carers, it can lead to
medical complications and impose an economic
burden.
Practical consequences
Nausea and vomiting can be very distressing for patients when they
are already feeling uncomfortable and anxious as a result of an
underlying cancer. Carers or medical personnel will also have to
clear up after patients.
Medical complications
There is the possibility of the regurgitation of stomach contents,
leading to risks of respiratory obstruction, pulmonary inflammation
and aspiration pneumonia. Electrolyte imbalance, dehydration and
weight loss can occur if nausea and vomiting is severe, which can
be a particular issue with already frail patients. Finally the
delayed ability to take oral therapy for patients who are likely
to be undergoing treatment with a number of other drugs can be a
concern.
The distress caused by the nausea and vomiting can lead to some
patients choosing to discontinue potentially curative therapy[1].
Economic burden
The economic burden of nausea and vomiting includes personnel time
in clearing up and material costs of disposable products, laundry,
caring for patients, delayed discharge and unplanned admission leading
to bed blocking.
The management of
CINV and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
The management of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy
and radiotherapy is especially important since the distress caused
by the nausea and vomiting can lead to some patients choosing to
discontinue potentially curative therapy[1].
However much of cancer therapy has a palliative intent and quality
of life is important. Therefore the effective management of nausea
and vomiting associated with cancer therapy is one of the primary
goals.
It is also important to distinguish between the different types
of nausea and vomiting, with some drugs being effective against
acute nausea and vomiting, whilst not having
an effect on delayed or anticipatory
nausea and vomiting. Also different drugs have been shown
to be effective against either CINV or radiotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting.
As with other treatment regimes for nausea and vomiting, combination
therapy using drugs of different classes is widespread. See for
example the Palliative Care Formulary [8].
Acute emesis
Various classes of drugs have efficacy against acute mild-to-moderate
emetogenic therapy. These include dopamine receptor antagonists,
cannabinoids, corticosteroids and the serotonin (5-HT3)
receptor antagonists. The most effective agents against acute emesis
resulting from mild- moderate- and highly-emetogenic chemotherapy
are the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists[9]. A wider range of agents,
including dopamine antagonists and anti-histamines is effective
against nausea and vomiting resulting from radiotherapy.
Delayed emesis
Anti-emetics, including 5-HT3 receptor antagonists,
have little efficacy against the delayed emesis that occurs 2-5
days after administration of agents such as cisplatin. Clinical
trials indicate that neurokinin NK1 receptor antagonists
can effectively prevent delayed emesis[10] but none are yet commercially available.
Anticipatory emesis
The best treatment for anticipatory emesis is the effective control
of acute and delayed emesis, although benzodiazepines are sometimes
used for their anxiolytic and amnesic effects when anticipatory
emesis is established[3].
The drug treatment of nausea and vomiting is summarised in Figure
10.
Figure 10 The drug treatment of CINV and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting
Summary
- Nausea and vomiting is a major problem in cancer therapy that
can lead to some patients refusing further, potentially curative
treatment
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and radiotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting result from a complex interaction between
various neurotransmitters and receptors in the CNS and gastrointestinal
tract.
- There are three types of emesis resulting from chemotherapy
and radiotherapy; acute, delayed and anticipatory. Each has a
different aetiology, and should be treated differently.
- 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are the most effective
treatment for acute emesis resulting from cancer chemotherapy.
- A wider range of agents, including anti-histamines and dopamine
antagonists is effective against nausea and vomiting resulting
from radiotherapy.
- 5-HT3 receptor antagonists are less effective against
delayed emesis resulting from treatment with agents such as cisplatin.
- The best treatment of anticipatory emesis is effective control
of acute and delayed emesis.
References
[1] Lindley CM, Hirsch JD, O'Neill CV, Transau
MC, Gilbert CS, Osterhaus JT. Quality of life consequences of
chemotherapy-induced emesis. Quality of life research. 1, 331-340
(1992).
[2] Morrow GR. Chemotherapy-related nausea
and vomiting: etiology and management. CAA Cancer Treat. J. 39,
89-104 (1989)
[3] Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced
emesis: results of Perugia Consensus Conference. Antiemetic Subcommittee
of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
(MASCC). Ann. Oncol. 9, 811-819 (1998).
[4] Grunberg SM, Hesketh PJ. Control of chemotherapy-induced
emesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1790-1796 (1993)
[5] Morrow GR, Roscoe JA, Kirschner JJ, Hynes
HE, Rosenbluth RJ. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting in the era
of 5-HT3 antiemetics. Support Care Cancer 6, 244-247 (1998).
[6] Graves T. Emesis as a complication of
cancer chemotherapy: pathophysiology, importance and treatment.
Pharmacotherapy 12, 337-345 (1992).
[7] Nitta Y, Nishibori M, Iwagaki H, Yoshino
T, Mori S, Sawada K, Nakaya N, Saeki K, Tanaka N. Changes
in serotonin dynamics in the gastrointestinal tract of colon-26
tumour-bearing mice: effects of cisplatin treatment. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's
Arch. Pharmacol. 364, 329-334 (2001).
[8] Twycross R, Wilcock, A and Thorp S.
Palliative Care Formulary (PCF1). Radcliffe Medical Press (1998)
[9] Walton SM. Advances in use of the 5-HT3
receptor antagonists. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 1, 207-23 (2000).
[10] Hesketh PJ. Potential role of the NK1
receptor antagonists in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Support Care Cancer 9, 350-354 (2001).
|